GEOFFREY'S RANTS
POST AWAY, YA SICK LITTLE BASTARD!
(Comments posted elsewhere by Geoffrey or his toadies will be deleted.)
[See also: "IF YOU NEED TO CONTACT ME".]
IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM YOUR BLOGGERS:
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS: BRING THEM ALL HOME ALIVE, NOW!
(Comments posted elsewhere by Geoffrey or his toadies will be deleted.)
[See also: "IF YOU NEED TO CONTACT ME".]
TO POST A COMMENT: CLICK ON "COMMENTS," "Post a Comment" or "# of COMMENTS" just below the SOCIAL BOOKMARKING LINKS (Digg, Delicious, etc), about three inches down from here. Please do comment. Thank you.
IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM YOUR BLOGGERS:
Suggestion Box & Tip Jar We would like to make over this blog to make it easier to access, to read and to comment on. We would also like to serve our readers better by providing more of what you need and want to see. All serious suggestions will be considered. We hope to move to our own domain in the near future, and we would like to ask for your financial assistance in doing that, and in upgrading our hardware & software. Small one-time donations and larger long-term subscriptions are welcome. Exclusive advertising is also available. If you think we are wasting our time in doing all this, please let us know. If you wish to help us, now is the time. As always, negative bullsh*t from right-wing trolls will be sh*tcanned. Thank you to everyone else. Please send feedback & PayPal contributions to cosanostradamusATexciteDOTcom. Thanks.
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS: BRING THEM ALL HOME ALIVE, NOW!
posted by Cosa Nostradamus @ 1/14/2005 11:59:00 PM
View blog reactions
38 Comments:
.
MARIA:
My sincere and humblest apologies for my contribution to this situation. I should have handled Geoffrey differently. I underestimated the severity of his emotional disturbance, which is obviously, to everyone, profound.
A local weather emergency and the ongoing consequences have kept me off the Internet, or I would have contacted you sooner. I will email you information on identifying and pursuing your stalkers I got from friends in Federal law enforcement here in Hawaii, and from contacts my mother made in DC during her years with the IRS. Mom's had experience with harassment over interstate com lines, so she's taken an interest in your case.
GEOFFREY:
I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings. It was unfair of me to attack and humiliate a person of your level of mental illness. I hope that you are able to find some relief in medication or therapy of some kind. You do clearly need professional help.
Your neuroses, while severe, are not sufficient to provide a valid legal defense. By continuing to harass and threaten Maria, you are in violation of Federal law. If you will agree to leave Maria's blog alone, and cease harassing her, I will allow you to post anything you want on my blog. If you continue to harass Maria, I will see to it personally that you are prosecuted and held liable for civil damages.
If you still pretend to be any kind of a man, or an intellect, stay away from this blog, and express your personal "issues" on my blog:
http://blog-me-no-blogs.blogspot.com/2005/01/geoffreys-rants.html#comments
Once again, I'm inviting you to stop your cowardly attacks on women, and take me on, man to, well, whatever you are. Do it, or face the consequences. Your software will not protect you. Not since 9/11. That goes for any other spineless, anonymous cowards out there: Cease and desist.
.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation:
"CYBERSTALKING"
All 50 states and the federal government have enacted statutes aimed at protecting the victims of stalking. Many of these statutes have existed for a long time, while others have originated recently. Some of the older statutes were broad enough to cover any type of stalking behavior, including cyberstalking; others had to be amended to do so. In some jurisdictions, new laws specifically addressing the problem of cyber-stalking have been enacted. In adapting general stalking and harassment statutes to cover instances of cyberstalking, legislators have expanded the means by which offenders commit this crime to include electronic communication devices.
F B I Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2003 Issue
UNITED STATES CODE18 U.S.C. §2261A Interstate Stalking (1996; 2000)
18 U.S.C. §875(c) Interstate Communications
47 U.S.C. §223(a)(1)(C) Harassing Telephone Calls in Interstate CommunicationsMASSACHUSETTS STATE LAWPenal Code Part IV, Title 1 - Chapter 265, Section 43, Stalking (Last checked: 27-Feb-02)Chapter 265 § 43A. Criminal Harassment. 2000.NEW YORK STATE LAWPenal Code Title HA120, Section 120.60Penal Code § 120.45. Stalking in the fourth degree. 1999.
Penal Code § 240.26. Harassment in the second degree. 1965. Amended 1994.
Penal Code § 240.30. Aggravated harassment in the second degree. 1965. Amended 2001.
F B I Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2002 Issue
Stalking the StalkerA relatively new form of stalking, cyberstalking, uses computers to stalk individuals and may take the form of electronic mail, faxes, or harassment in Internet chat rooms. For example, in one recent incident, a woman in San Francisco received about 1,500 pages of e-mails and faxes over a 2-month period that threatened her life and those of her children. Governmental authorities find it difficult to estimate how many individuals are victims of cyber-stalking, although they also note that the number of complaints concerning this type of unwanted contact have increased in recent years. In addition, such cases prove hard to prosecute successfully. In stalking cases, a precipitating event occurs 80 percent of the time. Such situations may include the breakup of a relationship, the loss of a job, the death of a parent, or the onset of a serious illness. Stalkers may blame their victims, and their actions may result from anger associated with the initial incident.
Other research also has found that stalkers often are self-conscious and lack self-esteem. Many stalkers have menial jobs and tend to be unmarried and live alone. They frequently have a history of being unable to sustain relationships, and they tend to use alcohol more than nonstalkers. Many stalkers have a history of prior stalking offenses, assaults, or substance abuse. Stalkers also may have mental disorders that commonly include not only substance dependence but also mood disorders and schizophrenia. Others may have personality disorders, such as narcissism, paranoia, antisocial personalities, borderline personality disorders, dependent disorders, or histrionic personality disorders. If stalkers have a treatable psychiatric disorder, some may benefit from medications or psychotherapy. Those truly antisocial or psychopathic, however, may not benefit from treatment. In these cases, the stalkers must be separated from their victims for the stalking behaviors to cease.
Clearly, the phenomenon of stalking represents a unique nexus between psychiatry and psychology on the one hand and law enforcement on the other. “There is no single profile of a stalker.... Stalkers exhibit a broad range of behaviors, motivations, and psychological traits.” As a consequence, several typologies have emerged from the literature, each containing two to three categories, based typically on some form of personality disorder. For example, research has found that some stalkers have an “attachment disorder,” stemming from abandonment in early childhood and resulting in the inability to maintain normal relationships as adults. In addition, many stalkers have a narcissistic personality in which individuals have an inflated sense of self-worth and a need for others to focus on them.
"Types of Stalkers""Research Studies">>
"A victim should say "no" once and only once. And then, never say anything to him again. If a stalker can’t have his victim’s love, he’ll take her hatred or her fear. The worst thing in the world for him is to be ignored. Think of little children: If they’re not getting the attention they want, they’ll act out and misbehave because even negative attention is better than none at all. Former intimate partner stalkers have their entire sense of self-worth caught up in the fact that, "she loves me." Therefore, any evidence to the contrary is seen as merely an inconvenience to overcome. Since giving up his victim means giving up his self-worth, he is very unlikely to do so. Don’t help him hang on.
Delusional stalkers frequently have had little, if any, contact with their victims. They may have major mental illnesses like schizophrenia, manic-depression or erotomania. What they all have in common is some false belief that keeps them tied to their victims. In erotomania, the stalker’s delusional belief is that the victim loves him. This type of stalker actually believes that he is having a relationship with his victim, even though they might never have met. The woman stalking David Letterman, the stalker who killed actress Rebecca Schaeffer and the man who stalked Madonna are all examples of erotomanic stalkers.
Another type of delusional stalker might believe that he is destined to be with someone, and that if he only pursues her hard enough and long enough, she will come to love him as he loves her. These stalkers know they are not having a relationship with their victims, but firmly believe that they will some day. John Hinckley Jr.’s obsession with Jodi Foster is an example of this type of stalker.
The typical profile of delusional stalkers is that of an unmarried and socially immature loner, who is unable to establish or sustain close relationships with others. They rarely date and have had few, if any, sexual relationships. Since at the same time they are both threatened by and yearn for closeness, they often pick victims who are unattainable in some way; perhaps she is married, or has been the stalker’s therapist, clergyman, doctor or teacher. Those in the helping professions are particularly vulnerable to delusional stalkers, because for someone who already has difficulty separating reality from fantasy, the kindness shown by the soon-to-be victim, the only person who has ever treated the stalker with warmth, is blown out of proportion into a delusion of intimacy. What these stalkers cannot attain in reality is achieved through fantasy and it is for this reason that the delusion seems to be so difficult to relinquish: Even an imaginary love is better than no love at all.
These delusional stalkers have almost always come from a background which was either emotionally barren or severely abusive. They grow up having a very poor sense of their own identities. This, coupled with a predisposition toward psychosis, leads them to strive for satisfaction through another, yearning to merge with someone who is almost always perceived to be of a higher status (doctors, lawyers, teachers) or very socially desirable (celebrities). It is as if this stalker says, "Gee. If she loves me, I must not be so bad." As Dean Martin compellingly crooned what could be considered the delusional stalker’s anthem: "You’re Nobody ‘Til Somebody Loves You." It is not unusual for this type of stalker to "hear" the soothing voice of his victim, or believe that she is sending him cryptic messages through others.
Some studies show that delusional stalkers are the most tenacious of all. Erotomanic delusions themselves last an average of ten years. How is this possible when the stalker has had little if any contact with his victim? As if drawn from the National Organ Donor Registry, the victim becomes the perfect match, with the potential to save the stalker’s life. When the victim says "no," he rationalizes it away, believing that, "her husband made her get that restraining order, she really loves me," or "her agent told her it would be bad for her career if we dated, but she really loves me." Therefore, as with every type of stalker, it is imperative that victims have no contact.
The final category of stalker is not lovelorn. He is the vengeful stalker. These stalkers become angry with their victims over some slight, real or imagined. Politicians, for example, get many of these types of stalkers who become angry over some piece of legislation or program the official sponsors. But, disgruntled ex-employees can also stalk, whether targeting their former bosses, co-workers or the entire company. Some of these angry stalkers are psychopaths, i.e. people without conscience or remorse. Some are delusional, (most often paranoid), and believe that they, in fact, are the victims. They all stalk to "get even."
Former intimate partner stalkers and delusional stalkers can become vengeful for a variety of reasons. For example, when their victims get restraining orders, or marry. Why a stalker’s anger is a very bad sign is described under what to do.
In general, for any type of stalker, the less of a relationship that actually existed prior to the stalking, the more mentally disturbed the stalker."
<<
CYBERSTALKING LINKS
.
.
"Stalking Victims Can Seek Justice in Civil Court"
.
.
"Cyberangels"
.
.
"Working to Halt On-line Abuse (WHOA)"
.
.
"Stalking Victims Sanctuary"
.
.
"Survivors of Stalking"
.
.
"Cyberstalking: A New Challenge for Law Enforcement and Industry"
.
.
"Gender Harassment on the Internet"
.
.
"CYBER-STALKING: OBSESSIONAL PURSUIT AND THE DIGITAL CRIMINAL: Risk Management"
.
.
"Stopping Abuse: Contact Their ISP"
.
.
"The National Center For Victims Of Crime: CYBERSTALKING"
Geoffrey fits the FBI profile of a stalker perfectly. Let me know if you hear from him again, in any context. He might only just be starting out on his life of crime, so maybe we can nip it in the bud. But I'm afraid he may already have a history of violence against women. Exercise caution. Take any threats seriously. Contact the authorities I've listed above: He's already in violation of several Massachusetts, New York, and Federal laws. I think I've got a line on his IP address. I won't hesistate to push the button on him, if I see any more if his shit. Keep yer umbrella handy, and swingable...
Funny, I recall you having threatened Geoff and others with physical violence several times.
You yourself now fit that profile, don't you Cosa?
I can't tell you how humorous it is to watch someone like YOU provide ME with information to prosecute you with.
Thanks for the research, dumbass.
Nope. I'm not a stalker, like you, coward. But thanks for checking in. And, do go on record with the Feds. I'll be seeing you.
the "anonymous" figures, doesn't it?
Wow Cosa! That was some amazing information you posted.
That was great of you to find all those sites. I'm sure others will benefit from them, besides Maria.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Defamation of character. Emotional duress. Hell, I'll even advise Geoff and his toadies to countersue you. The list is growing. I bet you regret having threatened so many people with violence, don't you? I saved all the text. You can zap out emails to your friends and have them delete your threatening comments, but the host tracks that too. Make sure you're available this week so the papers can get served.
CUL:Yup. Cowards, every one of them. I hope I do get some court papers: They always have names on them. Real names. Idiots.
LADY:Yeah, hopefully not, but it's there if they do need the info. This kind of activity has to be stopped. It's like some lunatic coming up to you in the street and screaming in your face, on a regular basis. And it's just as illegal. Well, Geoffrey and his fellow worms are in for a rude awakening.
"ANONYMOUS":Sorry. Only one "Anonymous" is allowed. How do we know which "Anonymous" YOU are? Coward. Future "Anonymous" postings will be deleted, unless signed.
Also, you don't insult my guests here. Automatic deletion. You homophobic asshole.
As to your "points," the ones you tried to make here, (not the ones under your Klan robes):1. Geoffrey invited me to fight him. Then he gave a phony address in Boston, so he's obviously afraid of getting his punk ass kicked for his long habit of stalking and harassing people from behind the safety of his computer. A really craven coward, like all neo-cons, who need others to fight for them, and refuse service in our military. I spit on you all.
2. I invited Geoffrey to come here to my home State of Hawaii to get the thrashing a punk like him so richly deserves for insulting a lady. Coward that he is, he refused to respond. Either he can't raise the plane-fare, or he's just chickenshit. Or both.
3. If INVITING someone to come five thousand miles to VOLUNTARILY get their ass kicked is actionable, bring it on. I can't wait to see your real names and addresses on court documents. Mua-ha-ha! They will be published, widely! And be sure to show the authorities your own precipitating posts, harassing and threatening a WOMAN, you creeps. If you don't, I will. Let's see who gets prosecuted, hm, stalker asshole?
4. Everything Geoffrey has ever posted is a blatant lie. All he ever does is libel and slander people on the Internet. He attacked Maria and her family for no real reason: He's just angry and frustrated that he can never have a woman like her. It's SO bloody obvious! And pathetic, like your defense of him.
5. The reason net-experienced people protect their personal data is that there are lowlife scum like you on the Web who will express their basic LOSER frustrations and mental illnesses by using that info against honest, decent, open and sweet people like Maria. As you and your scummy friends just did, on her site, which got you all banned. Once you insects have all been eliminated from the Web, we can all speak more freely. You can hide, but you can't run, punks.
6. The second "Anonymous" post was deleted for the reasons sited in this post. Do not insult my guests, and sign your posts, slimy Republican cowards.
"ANONYMOUS":I'll assume you're the first "ANONYMOUS." You're "advising" Geoffrey? Are you licensed to practise law in any jurisdiction? What bar are you a member of? What is your name, address, email, fax and phone number? Has Geoffrey retained you? (Don't take a check!) I look forward to hearing from you. See you ALL in court. In the mean time, leave Maria alone.
Oh, and, by the way, I suggest you read and re-read the information on FBI stalker profiles. You and you "client" both fit them, to a "T." Get some help. Stop the stalking. Or you'll be the ones in court, for real, you ridiculous, sad little bullies and toadies you. At least you know what you are now. And so does everyone else. And so will everyone in your home jurisdiction, soon. HAH! BRING IT ON, PUSSIES!!!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
"ANONYMOUS":
.
Sorry. No unsigned posts.
And, once again, Geoffrey the coward INVITED me to come kick his ass. Then he lied about his address.
Like I said, see you in court. Or not... PUSSY!
Anyone who wants to read the WHOLE exhange betwen Geoffrey, Maria, myself and others on which this anonymous coward is obsessing now, go here:
"By Beauty Damned: January 13th 2005: I Never Get Tired Of These"Or not. There's some funny Bushisms. That's what pissed Geoffrey off in the first place: A mere WOMAN making fun of his "fearless" leader, the deserter Dubya. Neocons cannot abide dissent or disagreement, especially from women, for whom they have NO respect, as you will see if you read through all the comments on that thread. I wouldn't recommend it. I wasted a lot of time drawing him off Maria and her family, but it was worth it, to me. Geoffrey is one sick puke. Look what he's doing here, now, a week later.
HAW-HAW-HAW CONSERVATIVE COWARDS!!! YOU LICK MY BOOTS HERE, TOO!!! HA!!!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Once again, for the benefit of mentally incompetent Republicans: No anonymous posts.
Whatsamatter, Gordon/Geoffrey? AFRAID??? Mua-ha-ha!!!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Post a Comment
<< Home